BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Xu KZ, Hu WJ, Shang YH, Miao YD, Wang LN. Modified frailty index and systemic immune-inflammation enable biological risk stratification in geriatric colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 119003 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.119003]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I am pleased to share my experience with the publication process at World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Overall, I found the experience to be highly positive and professional. The submission system was straightforward to navigate, and the editorial office provided clear instructions at every stage. The peer review process was rigorous but fair—the reviewers offered thoughtful and constructive comments that helped me significantly strengthen my manuscript. I was particularly impressed by the responsiveness of the editorial team; from initial submission to final acceptance, the entire process took approximately three months. I also appreciated the journal's transparent publication policies and their careful attention to ethical and statistical rigor. Based on my experience, I consider this journal a reliable and trustworthy platform for researchers in gastrointestinal oncology, and I would certainly recommend it to my colleagues.